President Donald Trump has nominated Kevin M. Warsh as the next chair of the Federal Reserve, setting the stage for a contentious confirmation battle and renewed debate over the central bank’s independence.
Warsh, a former Fed governor who served from 2006 to 2011, emerged ahead of several high-profile contenders, including White House economic adviser Kevin A. Hassett and current Fed governor Christopher J. Waller.
Rick Rieder, a senior executive at BlackRock, was also among the finalists.
The nomination comes at a time when the Fed has faced sustained criticism from the administration over its reluctance to cut interest rates more aggressively, raising questions about how the institution’s leadership could evolve under a Trump-appointed chair.
Confirmation prospects under scrutiny
Despite the nomination, doubts are growing over whether Warsh will secure Senate approval.
Analysts warn that the confirmation process could be prolonged and politically charged.
Kathleen Brooks, research director at XTB, said Warsh is unlikely to face an easy path through Congress.
She pointed to two key dynamics: his recent shift toward a more dovish stance, which may have appealed to the White House, and the broader controversy surrounding accusations that the administration has sought to erode the Fed’s independence.
Political divisions emerged almost immediately after the announcement, with lawmakers from both parties signalling that the confirmation process could become a proxy battle over the relationship between the Fed and the White House.
Senate arithmetic and partisan tensions
Republican Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina has said he would oppose Warsh’s nomination until a federal investigation involving current Fed chair Jerome Powell is resolved.
Tillis, a member of the Senate Banking Committee, argued that protecting the Fed from political pressure or legal intimidation is essential.
The retiring North Carolina lawmaker’s vote is needed to advance Warsh’s nomination through the Senate Banking Committee, which oversees the Fed and considers its nominees.
Republicans hold a narrow 13–11 majority on the Senate Banking Committee, meaning Warsh’s nomination could stall if all Democrats and Tillis vote against him.
Asked whether the Senate could confirm a Fed nominee without Tillis’s support, Majority Leader John Thune said on Thursday, “Uh, probably not.”
Tillis’s objections appear limited to the probe involving Powell, suggesting that if the Justice Department were to step back from the investigation, Warsh’s confirmation could move ahead swiftly.
He said on Bloomberg TV Friday morning he doesn’t think Warsh “comes in as more or less going to do the bidding of the administration, which is critically important.”
Besides, other Republicans have been more supportive.
Senate Banking Chair Tim Scott (R-S.C.) said in a statement that Warsh “has deep knowledge of markets and monetary policy that will be essential in this role.”
He vowed to lead a “thoughtful, timely confirmation process that carefully examines his vision for focusing the Federal Reserve on its core mission.”
What Warsh’s nomination means for the Fed’s autonomy
Economists and market participants are divided over what Warsh’s nomination means for the Fed’s autonomy.
“Kevin Warsh seems a relatively benign pick when it comes to the issue of Fed independence front,” argued ABN Amro’s senior US economist Rogier Quaedvlieg.
“He is not clearly in camp Trump, and despite having a different view on monetary policy compared to the consensus of the FOMC over the past years, we don’t see this nomination as a further attack on the Fed’s independence.”
Analysts also point out that the Fed chair’s influence has limits, as interest rate decisions are made collectively by a twelve-member policy committee.
Even so, the chair plays a critical role in shaping debate, guiding communication and building consensus, making the appointment politically and economically significant.
The post Why confirmation of Kevin Warsh’s Fed chair nomination might face hurdles appeared first on Invezz
