Editor's Pick

US court ruled in favour for Trump’s $100,000 H-1B visa application fee

A federal court ruling has cleared the way for the Trump administration to proceed with a sharp increase in H-1B visa application fees, a move that could significantly alter how US companies hire skilled foreign workers.

The decision, delivered on Tuesday, allows a $100,000 charge on new applications, reshaping one of the most widely used employment-based visa programmes.

The outcome marks an important legal win for President Donald Trump, while creating fresh uncertainty for technology firms and other sectors that depend on global talent to fill specialised roles.

Judge backs presidential authority

US District Judge Beryl Howell ruled that the administration acted within the law when it imposed the higher fee.

She found that Congress had already granted the president broad authority to act in areas tied to economic and national security, and that this power covered the proclamation signed in September.

The ruling directly rejected arguments that the fee exceeded presidential authority or conflicted with existing immigration statutes.

According to the court, the proclamation fell squarely within powers delegated by lawmakers, even though it represents a dramatic departure from previous fee levels.

Business challenge rejected

The lawsuit had been brought by the US Chamber of Commerce, which argued in October that the proposed charge would effectively shut businesses out of the programme.

In the lawsuit, the nation’s largest business lobbying group said the proposed fee increase is unlawful, arguing that it conflicts with federal immigration law and goes beyond the fee-setting authority granted by Congress.

Following the ruling, the Chamber said it was reviewing its legal options, including a potential appeal.

The group has consistently warned that such a high fee would make visas unaffordable for many employers, particularly smaller firms that rely on overseas expertise to expand.

Why H-1B visas matter

The H-1B programme allows US employers to hire college-educated foreign workers with specialised skills.

While visas are allocated through a lottery, usage is heavily concentrated in the technology sector.

Companies such as Amazon, Tata Consultancy Services Ltd., Microsoft, Meta Platforms Inc., and Apple Inc. account for some of the highest numbers of approved H-1B workers, based on government data.

The administration has argued that the fee increase is intended to discourage misuse of the programme and to encourage firms to prioritise domestic hiring.

Critics counter that the policy risks creating labour shortages in fields where qualified US workers are already scarce.

More lawsuits still pending

The Chamber’s case is not the only legal challenge facing the policy. A coalition of 19 state attorneys general has filed a separate lawsuit focusing on the expected impact on public services.

Their complaint highlights potential disruptions in healthcare and education, sectors that also depend on H-1B professionals.

In addition, a global nurse-staffing agency has launched its own legal action, underscoring concerns that higher costs could worsen staffing pressures across critical services.

The post US court ruled in favour for Trump’s $100,000 H-1B visa application fee appeared first on Invezz

You May Also Like

Latest News

MILAN (Reuters) -Italian billionaire Francesco Gaetano Caltagirone has emerged as a leading player in the reshaping of Italy’s financial sector that is currently under...

Latest News

MILAN (Reuters) -Italian billionaire Francesco Gaetano Caltagirone has emerged as a leading player in the reshaping of Italy’s financial sector that is currently under...

Editor's Pick

Oil prices were mostly flat after rising earlier in the session on Thursday due to a fall in US inventories.  According to the US...

Latest News

MILAN (Reuters) -Italian billionaire Francesco Gaetano Caltagirone has emerged as a leading player in the reshaping of Italy’s financial sector that is currently under...

Disclaimer: Bullsmarketdominators.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Copyright © 2025 Bullsmarketdominators.com

Exit mobile version